Why did they even bring up Patterson? The Cubs are lousy with second baseman (by my count, DeRosa, Cedeno, Theriot, and Fontenot all play the position) and, as noted here, replacing Soriano's bat by playing, in essence, two second baseman is not very productive. The stated reason for bringing up Murton is that the Cubs will "be facing some left-handed pitchers, and the teams we're playing have some left-handers in the bullpen," according to Lou Piniella. But wasn't this forseeable a couple days ago, when they brought up Patterson? All of this smacks of nothing more than lazy team management.
Also, I've been busy and wanted to do a post examining Derrek Lee's claim that his hot hitting this year is a result of his hitting more fly balls and less grounders. But before I could get to it Derek Smart at the excellent Cub Town blog wrote exactly what I was going to:
I've included this season, last season, and his breakout 2005 for comparison. As you can see, he's actually hitting fewer flies this year compared to last, and if I'd included his entire career, you'd see he's hitting groudballs at a higher rate in 2008 than he did in any other year. He is, however, getting a ridiculous number of his flies to leave the yard - well above the rate he showed in that great 2005 season...
However, I must disagree with this conclusion:
Derek's post shows that the real reason Lee's hitting so many homers so far is that his rate of home runs per fly ball is astronomically higher than his career averages. Whether it is because Lee has been hot or just a small sample size fluke, it isn't an indication that the best hitter in 2005 has returned completely to form.
Whether it's because his wrist feels better, he's seeing more cookies, or having one more biscuit for breakfast, it appears in the early going that the monster of 2005 - The Savior - has returned.
No comments:
Post a Comment